What is the significance of the title?
I think the significance of the title is made very clearly at the end of this dialogue. " I will go to the mountains with my mother, sister and the cannon. I will plunge his remains into the barrel and point it into a hill so that he doesn't take anyone with him. I will light the fuse. But I will not cover my ears. Because when I blow what used to be my dad into the earth, I want it to hurt." (pg. 440)
When reading this dialogue, I noticed that the girl and her father were total opposites, they did not really agree on anything, she thought of him as an indifferent gunsmith and crazy republican, where as she thought of herself as a passionate music lover and democrat. Throughout her younger years she was always bothered by her fathers devotion to his gun collection and his obsession to make ammo, where as her twin sister found it fascinating. If anyone was an outcast in the family I would have to say that I think it was the narrator. She never really understood why her father was so passionate about his guns, but she thought one day that if she was ever going to try and understand him and his hobby that this was her chance, since she hated everything about guns, she found out that her father had been working on a project for a couple of years, he was making a cannon, she thought that if she was ever going to understand her fathers love for what he does that this was her time, she thought that this was a great opportunity because it was not a gun, and as she says in the writing it was "... a completely ceremonial object. Unwieldy and impractical. " (pg. 439) When she first called him and told him that she wanted to watch him shoot off the cannon, he was shocked, this is because she was never interested in any of his work before. They went up to the mountains in Montana and light off the small cannon. The narrator was intrigued, in a way that she never really thought of before. She thought that it was really neat and her father thought so too.
When the two hikers come about and see how the cannon is used, they noticed that she has a tape recorder and a microphone, which is called a shotgun mike. This is when she realizes that her and her father are the now the same person, just in different ways. She states "We're both smart-alecky loners with goofy projects and weird equipment. And since this whole target practice outing was my idea, I was no longer at his adversary" (pg. 439) This is when she realizes that her and her father both carry a passion and just because they are different projects that they care about does not mean that they cannot be close and not carry a relationship. At this point I think that all of the dislike that she had for her father growing up as a child began to vanish and she begin to appreciate her father for who he was, and not judge him on the acts of his projects.
With the last paragraph in the dialogue it captivates the the meaning of the writing. I believe that she is stating that she is "shooting dad" for who he was in her younger years, and will put his remains in a cannon as a new found bond that they established together. She is saying that will respect his love for is projects and also not be covering her ears when the sounds goes off because she wants it to hurt, meaning the pain that she felt as a child when she was in her "hole", when her and her father had no communication. This would be her would be her closure.
Emily,
ReplyDeleteI really liked how Vowel went about trying to understand her father's passion. She had previously tried shooting a gun and hadn't liked the experience at all. When she tried to really connect with her father, she decided to try shooting a canon. From this we see that she didn't compromise her ideals or go against what she believed in. She says so herself, a canon is impractical. You can't really go around hurting people with a canon, it's more of a "ceremonial object". She connected with her father all the while being firm about her feelings towards guns.
Emily,
ReplyDeleteI liked how you described your last paragraph. I agree that you feel she has respect for her father's love for his project. It makes him who he is and despite their differences, she has realized they are the same. When Sarah mentioned how she will not cover her ears because she wants it to hurt does seem meaningful. Like you described it would be her closure.
I really liked that Sarah and her father were able to have an experience that brought them closer together. That experience made Sarah realize that her and her dad were actually a lot alike. Eventhough they believed in different things, they had the same amount of passion for those different things. In this way they were similar. I think that the significance of the title is very important. Sarah has never liked guns, but she seems to be okay with the cannon because people are not going to be carrying cannons around to shoot each other and rob stores. When her father passes away she is going to be shooting her father's ashes in little paper bags out of that cannon, so in a way she is shooting her dad. When I read the title, before I read the story, I was very curious as to what the story was about. I did not expect it to be about this, but it was a good story.
ReplyDeleteHello Emily!
ReplyDeleteI find the connection you made between the title and the last paragraph of the essay fascinating. I love reading other people's ideas and the different perspectives they have about a certain topic. For me, the title shooting dad meant eliminating the father out of her life, shutting him off. I really liked your interpretation, it gives the essay a more emotional and dramatic ending. I always enjoy reading your blogs you are a great writer!
Emily
ReplyDeleteIt can be hard sometimes to be so different from your parents and I too agree they were total opposites. She was oil and he was water. Finally when he made the cannon she decided to grow up and mature. Sarah finds a new found respect for her fathers work, although she might not completely agree with it. good job
-Catherine
I like how you write your blog. I also think that shooting dad was her way of bonding with him, accepting his life and his interest the way she had never before.You make some good points and it was well written.
ReplyDeleteHi Emily:
ReplyDeleteI like how you pointed out your view of shooting her dad was her bonding with him, I think close proximity to our fathers is healthy but yet sad it is changing in our society these days....seems our attachments and differences are more real now then in the past. Time and affection is important for bonding which is what I saw a lack of between them. Then is quality better than the amount?
Thank you for your reading!!
Daue